|Title of paper. Add TeX formulas using the following formats: $In-line Formula$ or \(Block Formula\)
|Search author profile by first, middle and last name or email address. If the profile is not found, you can add the author by completing first, middle, and last names as well as author email address.
|“Too Long; Didn’t Read”: a short sentence describing your paper
|Abstract of paper. Add TeX formulas using the following formats: $In-line Formula$ or \(Block Formula\)
|Upload a single PDF containing the paper, references and any appendices
|See the CFP for the requirements for short and long papers
|The most relevant research area / track for the paper
|Provide the URL of your previous submission to ACL Rolling Review if this is a resubmission (this URL will start with https://openreview.net)
|Upload a single PDF of your previous submission to ACL Rolling Review if this is a resubmission
|Upload a single PDF of your responses to the previous reviews to ACL Rolling Review if this is a resubmission
|Reviewer/Editor Reassignment Request
|If this is a resubmission and you think that a reviewer or action editor last time was not qualified to review the paper, please add the reviewer ID (comma-separated for multiple ones) to this box. Add ‘AE’ for the action editor. This option should be used sparingly, so please only request this in relatively clear circumstances
|Reviewer/Editor Reassignment Justification
|Please specify the reason for any reassignment request. Example reasons include clear lack of expertise in the area or dismissing the work without any concrete comments regarding correctness of the results or argumentation, limited perceived impact of the methods or findings, lack of clarity in exposition, or other valid criticisms. Generally we accept such requests, but the expectation is that papers have been revised based on the earlier reviews and it is up to the discretion of the action editors or editors in chief whether the request is granted. Answers to this question also helps us identify issues in the review process and guide efforts to improve review quality.
|Each ARR submission can be accompanied by one .tgz or .zip archive containing software (max. 200MB).
|Each ARR submission can be accompanied by one .tgz or .zip archive containing data (max. 200MB).
|Would the authors like to have a public anonymous pre-print of the submission?
|If there are any publicly available non-anonymous preprints of this paper, please list them here (provide the URLs please)
|If you have a venue that you are hoping to submit this paper to, please enter it here. You must enter the designated acronym from our list of venues. Note that entering a preferred venue is not a firm commitment to submit your paper to this venue, but it will help ARR and the venue chairs in planning, so we highly recommend filling in your current intentions. Please enter only your first choice
|Consent to Share Data
|I agree for the anonymized metadata associated with my submission to be included in a publicly available dataset. This dataset WILL include scores, anonymized paper and reviewer IDs that allow grouping the reviews by paper and by reviewer, as well as acceptance decisions and other numerical and categorical metadata. This dataset WILL NOT include any textual or uniquely attributable data like names, submission titles and texts, review texts, author responses, etc. Your decision to opt-in the data does not affect the reviewing of your submission in any way
|Consent to Review
|By submitting this paper, all authors of this paper agree to serve as reviewers for ACL Rolling Review if eligible and invited
|Responsible NLP Research Questions
|A series of questions from the responsible NLP research checklist