Arr Eic Changes
August 31, 2022
Two new EICs have started their service (and several new EiCs are expected to start soon): * Mausam * Thamar Solorio
ACL Rolling Review (ARR) is a centralized reviewing service targeting top-tier conferences under the Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Built atop the OpenReview platform, ARR implements the initial stages of conference reviewing in 2 month cycles, culminating in the release to authors of reviews and a metareview.
- Authors may submit a revision to a subsequent ARR cycle and request the same or new reviewers.
- Reviews are decoupled from acceptance decisions: as long as a paper has reviews and has not yet been accepted by a venue, the authors can choose among participating venues, whose program committees will consider the already-reviewed papers for acceptance.
For further information about submitting, see the page for Authors.
ARR began with a 2020 proposal. As of mid-2023, it has evolved with experience and feedback from the community. In 2024, the ACL, EACL, NAACL, and EMNLP main conferences all used ARR as the sole submission system. The upcoming participating venues are listed at dates and venues. The ARR team continues to welcome input on the design of the review process. See also the ARR changelog and future plans.
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
Updates
Max Cycle Load Openreview
July 5, 2022
Starting from the July 2022 ARR cycle, the Reviewers and Action Editors can specify their unavailability and maximum load directly in OpenReview. Load specification is designed as a reviewer/AE task in OpenReview, to be completed before the submission deadline for the respective cycle (for the July 22 cycle, the deadline for specifying the max. load is July 15). A detailed guide on how to declare your max. load / unavailability can be found here.
In Cycle Author Response
April 13, 2022
Starting with the April 15 deadline, there will be a brief period for author response within the ARR review cycle. * for 5 days after the deadline for regular reviews, authors can make comments on the reviews, using the discussion forum within OpenReview (as is done, for example, with ICLR) * the comments should be limited to clear factual errors or serious misunderstandings * reviewers may respond to authors’ comments or update their reviews, but are not obligated to do so * action editors will take these comments into account when writing their metareview
Six Week Cycles
April 7, 2022
Effective the 15 April 2022 deadline, with permission of the ACL executive and the ACL committee on reviewing, ARR will be moving to a six-week cycle with deadlines every six weeks.
Recognition
March 3, 2022
Action editors and reviewers may now request letters of recognition for their ARR service! Instructions can be found in the: * Action editors’ guide to OpenReview * Reviewers’ guide to OpenReview
Stats
February 17, 2022
We have data. Thanks to great work from Sebastin Santy on our tech team, we now have a regularly updated statistics dashboard for ACL Rolling Review. When you refer to it, please note the last updated date as data for the current cycles may be somewhat delayed. As always, feedback welcome.